Home
 Education/ Choice/ Vouchers/ Anti-Busing
The Brown v. Board of Education Fraud
The Issue is Economics, Not Who Likes You
What Would Schools Be Like?
Lifting "Desegregation" Court Orders
Parents Should Take Back Power From the NAACP
Williston High
Lies About School Choice
The Invincible Thaddeus Lott
Mismatching Students for Dollars
The Busing Nightmare Continues
Blacks Against Busing
Still Fighting Busing
Busing Updates
Fighting the Good Fight for School Reform
Chad Just Keeps Getting Better
The Issue is Economics, Not Who Likes You
The Elves of Social Engineering
For Separation of School and State, But Against Vouchers
HEAF: Not Just Another Program
Breazell Is Out
Unfinished Business
The Schools That Vouchers Built
 
Printer-friendly versionView Printable Format
Contact Issues & Views
(Also enter "Subscribe" to receive free Biweekly Updates)

Parents Should Take Back Power From the NAACP

By Tracie Reddick

[Reprinted from Issues & Views Spring 1998]

Color me surprised upon learning that the Pinellas County School Board (Fla.) had rejected a plan it has painstakingly negotiated with the NAACP Defense Fund to loosen the county’s desegregation order. In a move that shocked NAACP members and elated many black and white parents, the board instead voted to seek unitary status, or release from court supervision.

The real cause for celebration does not rest solely on the fact that forced busing may soon be over. It is the fact that black parents will finally have some say about where their children are schooled, rather than have the NAACP act as their educational guardians.

Forget forced busing. Let’s talk about how the order renders black parents powerless. If the responsibility of feeding, clothing and providing shelter for my son is my responsibility, then shouldn’t I be able to determine which school he attends? The NAACP should not be able to usurp my authority on this issue. But it can.

In fact, the NAACP’s opinion has outweighed the pleas of black parents for nearly three decades. This civil rights organization should be charged with educational neglect, given the current state of affairs of black students. Consider this: School statistics show that more than 50% of black children enrolled in Pinellas schools are failing their subjects. Black children make up 18% of the district’s total enrollment yet account for 36% of out-of-school suspensions.

What has been the NAACP’s response to these dismal statistics? The formation of countless task forces rather than facing the root of the problem: busing. How can you expect children to perform at their best when they have to get up at the crack of dawn to attend a school on the other side of town or, in some cases, in a totally different city?

How can you act bewildered when a child who is dropped off on a strange campus does not feel connected to a school miles away from his home? Why wouldn’t parents in south St. Petersburg feel disconnected from the school their kids are bused to and a tinge of anger when they drive past a school marquee in their neighborhood touting the campus’s latest success?

Instead of supporting the board’s decision to end busing, the NAACP is fighting it. Why? This is not a question of "If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it." After 27 years, it’s time to try something new. A return to neighborhood schools does not necessarily mean a return to segregation. And if some campuses end up becoming predominantly black, that doesn’t mean black students will not be able to excel. Educational studies have shown that black kids, even using second-hand textbooks, performed better in school during segregation than they do today.

Still, NAACP officials contend it is important that children receive an education in a culturally diverse environment, since that is where they’re going to live, play and work for the rest of their lives. That argument goes to show how much the NAACP is out of touch with reality. Visit any campus on any given day, and there’s not a whole lot of race mixing going on. The majority of the kids hang out with others who look like them. It’s the same in the workplace. And if the neighborhoods they lived in were truly integrated, then busing would be a moot issue.

School choice does not deprive parents of their ability to send children to schools with kids of other races. Those parents can still opt to have their kids bused. It does, however, satisfy parents who want their elementary-aged children to attend a neighborhood school rather than have them hauled across the county. More importantly, it takes the power away from the NAACP and puts it back in the hands of black parents, who should have the right to determine where their children are educated.

Without the court-imposed 30% racial cap for black students per campus, perhaps my son--who has made the honor roll, received honorable mention in the science fair and scored high marks on standardized tests--will not have to be bused to Pinellas Park. He passes three neighborhood schools--two within walking distance--during his 35-minute bus ride. Better still, my son no longer will represent a different statistic: No. 1 and No. 9 on the waiting lists of two separate magnet programs for the 1998-1999 school year.

--Tracie Reddick is a columnist for the Tampa Tribune. © 1998 Tampa Tribune

Copyright 1998 © Tampa Tribune


Printer-friendly version
Printer-friendly version
Why register? Click here to learn the benefits of registration.

home | printable  

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views
All rights reserved.
Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.
Last updated: Sun May 11 14:22:03 2008 CDT