Home
 Wish I'd said that!
Stop trying to racially balance the schools
What patriotism is not
Getting political mileage
Making a living off "hate"
Some truth about slavery
Contempt for the rule of law
Rejecting the "Latest Thing"
A lost generation
It's not going to happen
Which word don't you understand?
Inspiring goals vs. real consequences
Attack by subversion
Drugging children
A world without man
Stupid regulations
Pick a country
The con games continue
The non-existent digital divide
Forced to compete
As if they were livestock
Booker T's common sense
Privacy and the presumption of guilt
Another victory for FIRE
Fraudulent diplomas
Gratitude, not guilt
Tyranny with a smile
From good intentions to corruption
Self-appointed monitors of "hate"
Get government out of the diversity business
Bulldozing property owners
Shibboleths vs. facts
The diversity fig leaf
Does diversity tolerate disagreement?
The problem isn't civil rights
Fostering more victimhood
Secession is legal
Reparations: racial power play
Ideological make-believe
Tired of the race racket
There are real group differences
The specter of data warehouses
Escape through vouchers
No principle at stake
"Resegregation" is not the government's business
The true test
Keeping blacks in check
Needed: A thicker skin
The primary problem
The underreported heinous crime
Still not closing the borders
Cashing in on GWTW
Has the man no pride?
Electioneering for me, but not for thee
Western values under assault
Stop trying to racially balance the schools
Promoting envy as "social justice"
A tool to punish men
Owned by the government
Mystic "diversity"
Supported by lies and duplicity
Fearing no one but God
Real people vs. abstract categories
Contempt for the Constitution
Staged alienation
A memorial to perpetuate victimhood
Legitimizing a myth
California's immigration woes
Still destroying the family
Inclusive secular clubs
Passing the cost on to others
Dependency plus paranoia
Doing more harm than good
A modern fad
Protecting us all from the WHAMs
Wolfing down New Yorkers' pets
Offending Hollywood
Laughing at affirmative action
Mississippi rising
Utopian aims
The Passion and its deceitful critics
Organized force endowed with legitimacy
The ongoing reparations fraud
Can you be more fair than fair?
Women as wanton killers
The crusade to nationalize land
J.P. Morgan meets the reparations crusaders
What real panic looks like
Welcome to the new conservatism
Discrimination via statistics
When blacks scold blacks
The punishment continues
What is wrong with these people?
Tone deaf and talentless
A zero-sum game
The scrupulous and the reptilian
Praise instead of rebuke
A madness in the soul
The menace of emotions
Seduction or coercion?
Giving people what they want
Farewell to the states
Put an end to eminent domain
On government interference
Rules to avoid poverty
Raking Whitey over the coals . . . again
Black Warmongers and Pseudo-conservatives
 
Printer-friendly versionView Printable Format
Contact Issues & Views
(Also enter "Subscribe" to receive free Biweekly Updates)

Privacy and the presumption of guilt

Wish I'd said that!

[Reprinted from Issues & Views November 26, 2001]

There is one phrase that has crept into the American vernacular that I wish I could banish from the hearts and minds of my countrymen: "If you're not guilty, then what have you got to hide?" The phrase equates the desire for privacy with the presumption of guilt. It suggests that anyone who wants to keep government's prying eyes away is trying to get away with something evil or criminal.

Today, as we try to flush out the terrorists in our midst, that phrase lingers in the air, providing a ubiquitous justification for invading our privacy. Of course, law enforcement has a point. If the government could know everything about each of us, no terrorist would ever again succeed in harming another innocent person. But would that Gattaca life be heaven or hell?

We have primed the pump with our easy slide into the computer-driven society. Out of convenience, we allow computers to gather information about our movements and choices.

We have gone from a nation of people whose motto was "Don't Tread on Me" to one where citizens don't mind so much being trod upon as long as it doesn't take much time--as long as the sobriety check-point line isn't excessively long, as long as the security guard looking in our purse is quick about it. Any grumbling comes not from the intrusion but the inconvenience. In modern America, time is more valuable than privacy.

Maybe it would be a safer world if our government knew about the assets of everyone. For a time we might gain some insight into the terrorist operations and the rich Saudi businessmen who support them--that is, until they completely bypass the banking system. But what about the 1984-like vulnerabilities that kind of knowledge engenders? Privacy is a necessary condition for independence and individuality. A watched people are a conforming people.

-- Robyn E. Blumner, excerpted from "Privacy Is Just So Suspicious," St. Petersburg Times (FL), 10/21/01.

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views


Printer-friendly version
Printer-friendly version

home | printable  

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views
All rights reserved.
Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.
Last updated: Sun May 11 14:22:03 2008 CDT