Home
 Wish I'd said that!
Stop trying to racially balance the schools
What patriotism is not
Getting political mileage
Making a living off "hate"
Some truth about slavery
Contempt for the rule of law
Rejecting the "Latest Thing"
A lost generation
It's not going to happen
Which word don't you understand?
Inspiring goals vs. real consequences
Attack by subversion
Drugging children
A world without man
Stupid regulations
Pick a country
The con games continue
The non-existent digital divide
Forced to compete
As if they were livestock
Booker T's common sense
Privacy and the presumption of guilt
Another victory for FIRE
Fraudulent diplomas
Gratitude, not guilt
Tyranny with a smile
From good intentions to corruption
Self-appointed monitors of "hate"
Get government out of the diversity business
Bulldozing property owners
Shibboleths vs. facts
The diversity fig leaf
Does diversity tolerate disagreement?
The problem isn't civil rights
Fostering more victimhood
Secession is legal
Reparations: racial power play
Ideological make-believe
Tired of the race racket
There are real group differences
The specter of data warehouses
Escape through vouchers
No principle at stake
"Resegregation" is not the government's business
The true test
Keeping blacks in check
Needed: A thicker skin
The primary problem
The underreported heinous crime
Still not closing the borders
Cashing in on GWTW
Has the man no pride?
Electioneering for me, but not for thee
Western values under assault
Stop trying to racially balance the schools
Promoting envy as "social justice"
A tool to punish men
Owned by the government
Mystic "diversity"
Supported by lies and duplicity
Fearing no one but God
Real people vs. abstract categories
Contempt for the Constitution
Staged alienation
A memorial to perpetuate victimhood
Legitimizing a myth
California's immigration woes
Still destroying the family
Inclusive secular clubs
Passing the cost on to others
Dependency plus paranoia
Doing more harm than good
A modern fad
Protecting us all from the WHAMs
Wolfing down New Yorkers' pets
Offending Hollywood
Laughing at affirmative action
Mississippi rising
Utopian aims
The Passion and its deceitful critics
Organized force endowed with legitimacy
The ongoing reparations fraud
Can you be more fair than fair?
Women as wanton killers
The crusade to nationalize land
J.P. Morgan meets the reparations crusaders
What real panic looks like
Welcome to the new conservatism
Discrimination via statistics
When blacks scold blacks
The punishment continues
What is wrong with these people?
Tone deaf and talentless
A zero-sum game
The scrupulous and the reptilian
Praise instead of rebuke
A madness in the soul
The menace of emotions
Seduction or coercion?
Giving people what they want
Farewell to the states
Put an end to eminent domain
On government interference
Rules to avoid poverty
Raking Whitey over the coals . . . again
Black Warmongers and Pseudo-conservatives
 
Printer-friendly versionView Printable Format
Contact Issues & Views
(Also enter "Subscribe" to receive free Biweekly Updates)

Keeping blacks in check

Wish I'd said that!

[Reprinted from Issues & Views September 23, 2002]

In the Guardian (3/30/02), black journalist Gary Younge reflects on the strange transformations of the term "Uncle Tom." He claims the expression has less to do with the original Harriet Beecher Stowe character than with a desire of blacks to control fellow blacks. In an excerpt, he writes:


The fictitious Tom's actual attributes and flaws soon became incidental. Black America had another use for him in real life. He was to represent the lackey, the moderate, the conciliator and the sell-out. If Stowe had not invented him, African-Americans would have had to. . . . Black radical Malcolm X once said: "Just as the slavemaster in that day used Uncle Tom to keep the field negroes in check, he was the same old slavemaster who today has negroes who are nothing but modern Uncle Toms--20th-century Uncle Toms--to keep you and me in check." But the truth is it was the term "Uncle Tom" itself that was really designed to keep black people in check. As a defensive response to racism, those who use it seek to enforce allegiance and cast out dissent purely on grounds of race.

Black people are not alone in this desire to police their borders in this way. Many cultures that feel on some level embattled will attempt to proscribe behaviour deemed equal to betrayal. That is how Zionist Jews get to brand anti-Zionist Jews "self- haters"--"They're people of Jewish extraction who've had most of the Jewishness extracted," one academic explained to me recently. Similarly, those not deemed to be sufficiently Irish become "West Brits."

Malcolm X was not talking about Uncle Tom the character but Uncle Tom the construct. The Tom of the novel had preferred to die than oversee his fellow slaves. But to Malcolm X, and many others before and since, Uncle Tom was the man preaching reform when others were preaching revolution; the one who advocated peace instead of war; the person who urged others to stay at home instead of taking to the streets; the leader who preached racial equality instead of Black Power.

In short, Uncle Tom is whoever you want him to be. Arbitrary in application--who decides who is an Uncle Tom and on what basis?--and prohibitive in nature, it exemplifies the very limits of race-thinking. Even though it is an insult that falls most readily from the lips of self-avowed radicals, it is in fact a reactionary form of psychological and behavioural racial policing within black communities.


Here is Younge's article on this site.

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views


Printer-friendly version
Printer-friendly version

home | printable  

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views
All rights reserved.
Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.
Last updated: Sun May 11 14:22:03 2008 CDT