Home
 Wish I'd said that!
Stop trying to racially balance the schools
What patriotism is not
Getting political mileage
Making a living off "hate"
Some truth about slavery
Contempt for the rule of law
Rejecting the "Latest Thing"
A lost generation
It's not going to happen
Which word don't you understand?
Inspiring goals vs. real consequences
Attack by subversion
Drugging children
A world without man
Stupid regulations
Pick a country
The con games continue
The non-existent digital divide
Forced to compete
As if they were livestock
Booker T's common sense
Privacy and the presumption of guilt
Another victory for FIRE
Fraudulent diplomas
Gratitude, not guilt
Tyranny with a smile
From good intentions to corruption
Self-appointed monitors of "hate"
Get government out of the diversity business
Bulldozing property owners
Shibboleths vs. facts
The diversity fig leaf
Does diversity tolerate disagreement?
The problem isn't civil rights
Fostering more victimhood
Secession is legal
Reparations: racial power play
Ideological make-believe
Tired of the race racket
There are real group differences
The specter of data warehouses
Escape through vouchers
No principle at stake
"Resegregation" is not the government's business
The true test
Keeping blacks in check
Needed: A thicker skin
The primary problem
The underreported heinous crime
Still not closing the borders
Cashing in on GWTW
Has the man no pride?
Electioneering for me, but not for thee
Western values under assault
Stop trying to racially balance the schools
Promoting envy as "social justice"
A tool to punish men
Owned by the government
Mystic "diversity"
Supported by lies and duplicity
Fearing no one but God
Real people vs. abstract categories
Contempt for the Constitution
Staged alienation
A memorial to perpetuate victimhood
Legitimizing a myth
California's immigration woes
Still destroying the family
Inclusive secular clubs
Passing the cost on to others
Dependency plus paranoia
Doing more harm than good
A modern fad
Protecting us all from the WHAMs
Wolfing down New Yorkers' pets
Offending Hollywood
Laughing at affirmative action
Mississippi rising
Utopian aims
The Passion and its deceitful critics
Organized force endowed with legitimacy
The ongoing reparations fraud
Can you be more fair than fair?
Women as wanton killers
The crusade to nationalize land
J.P. Morgan meets the reparations crusaders
What real panic looks like
Welcome to the new conservatism
Discrimination via statistics
When blacks scold blacks
The punishment continues
What is wrong with these people?
Tone deaf and talentless
A zero-sum game
The scrupulous and the reptilian
Praise instead of rebuke
A madness in the soul
The menace of emotions
Seduction or coercion?
Giving people what they want
Farewell to the states
Put an end to eminent domain
On government interference
Rules to avoid poverty
Raking Whitey over the coals . . . again
Black Warmongers and Pseudo-conservatives
 
Printer-friendly versionView Printable Format
Contact Issues & Views
(Also enter "Subscribe" to receive free Biweekly Updates)

The underreported heinous crime

Wish I'd said that!

[Reprinted from Issues & Views November 4, 2002]

In a stinging, thoughtful article, "Hate Crime Reversed," columnist and talk show host Armstrong Williams denounces the biased approach shown by almost all media outlets to an almost unbelievably heinous crime. To this day, many Americans have never heard of Reginald and Jonathan Carr, two brothers who, on December 19, 2001, in Wichita, Kansas, burst into a home where five young people in their 20s were visiting, three men and two women, and proceeded to put them through a night of torment and horror. The Carr brothers, who are black, physically and mentally brutalized the five white friends, before shooting each in the head. Four of them died. Williams compares the media treatment of this crime, that took place almost a year ago, to the endless, almost minute-by-minute coverage of the dragging death of James Byrd, the black man who, in 1998, was murdered by two white men in Texas. Williams writes:

Unlike the Byrd murder, however, the Wichita massacre received little national exposure, largely because the victims were white. That means no Jesse Jackson screaming into his megaphone about how the government needs to wipe out racial violence. And no Rev. Al Sharpton fulminating into his power horn about the need for a special category of law dealing with racially-motivated crimes. Hardly anyone even raised an eyebrow when Wichita officials declined to try the case as a hate crime.

Had the victims been four black people killed by two white assailants, the hate crime prophets would have come streaming into Kansas carrying the national media in tow. Yet, when an equally savage and racially-motivated crime is perpetrated against white people, the response is muted.

Apparently, the supporters of hate crime legislation are concerned with only stemming racially-motivated violence against blacks. This inconsistency suggests that hate crime legislation is not about justice. After all, the law covers the crime of murder. Hate crime legislation is not about redressing inequality, or it would be equally concerned with all racially-motivated crimes. Hate crime is about twisting the law to accommodate the all-encompassing view that blacks are forever victims of whites. It's about how whites can never truly empathize with the first-hand effects of racial injustice. It's about the politically correct view that racial injustice is "a black thing."

See on this site, "What's so special about hate crimes?"

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views


Printer-friendly version
Printer-friendly version

home | printable  

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views
All rights reserved.
Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.
Last updated: Sun May 11 11:22:03 2008 AKDT