Home
 The Damage of Liberal Ideology
And now it's the norm
The Supreme Court
Ending Judicial Dictatorship
The Politically Incorrect Professor
Insulation From Reality
The Moynihan Report
Paving the Way For Tyranny
Double Standards
Shut Up and Dialogue
The Demoralization of the Military
From Marxism to the Market
The Dumb Leading the Dumber
The Lie Is Winning
 
Printer-friendly versionView Printable Format
Contact Issues & Views
(Also enter "Subscribe" to receive free Biweekly Updates)

Double Standards

[Reprinted from Issues & Views Fall 1997]

After Nature once again asserts itself (and it always does), and after Western man gets his act together again (not in our lifetime), this legal case probably will be looked upon as one of the more foolish episodes of our peculiar times.

It all began in 1995 when the Center for Military Readiness (CMR) published a report that contained 105 pages of records related to women s training in the Navy. The CMR, headed by Elaine Donnelly, was formed in 1993, to monitor and measure the impact of new social policies that were imposed on the military to satisfy the demands of feminist and homosexual interest groups. The Center is composed of civilians and former military personnel who are concerned about the ongoing effectiveness of the Armed Forces and the consequences of social engineering.

The published report, entitled, "CMR Special Report: Double Standards in Naval Aviation," made clear the lowered standards at work in the Navy, when it came to the training of women pilots. This news may not have caused much stir in a military that is fast feminizing, were it not for the in-flight death of a female pilot and the dismissal of another.

Lt. Kara Hultgreen was killed in October 1994, while trying to land her F-14 Tomcat fighter plane. The other woman pilot, Lt. Carey Lohrenz, was dismissed from further aviation training after her flying performance was described by instructors as "unsafe, undisciplined, and unpredictable."

The CMR's report is filled with factual data on how the Navy leaned over backwards to accommodate the obvious shortcomings of women trainees. Naval flight instructor, Lt. Patrick Burns, has gone public with his disclosures of the double standards that are now part of Navy procedure. There are detailed accounts of the unfortunate Lt. Hultgreen's flying sessions and the difficulties she was having in learning to control her airplane. During her final session, while attempting to land on an aircraft carrier, Hultgreen crashed into the sea.

Lt. Lohrenz, who failed in her attempts to master the flying of an F-14, has filed a lawsuit against Elaine Donnelly and the Center for Military Readiness. Lohrenz blames Donnelly for the termination of her career as a pilot. According to her and her lawyers, the publication of Lohrenz s dismal flight record violated her privacy and "defamed" her. In Lohrenz v. Donnelly, Lohrenz claims that the report, and the ensuing news stories, caused her to "lose confidence" in her flying abilities and caused her colleagues to "scorn" her. Actually, the initial CMR report identified her only as "Pilot B." It was later articles by media reporters that named her as the pilot in question.

Those who support the CMR consider the lawsuit a direct assault on First Amendment rights of free speech. They believe that the obvious goal of the Lohrenz suit is to silence open discussion about safety and double standards in military training. This is seen by many as a major public policy issue. The desire to shut down discussion is clear, since Lohrenz also has named two newspapers as defendants in the suit, because they published articles about the CMR report.

Intimidated by the outsiders who now set policy for the military, the Navy s brass ran for cover. They first withheld certain information, apparently, because it would reinforce CMR s claims about double standards. Next, the Admirals equivocated on undeniable facts in the case, sending out false reports that Hultgreen's accident was due to "engine problems." And, as could be expected in our current politically correct climate, the brass decided to reinstate Lohrenz, as a land-based pilot. Elaine Donnelly says that this "concession" to Lohrenz "overruled the first-hand judgments of a long line of instructors and superiors in the Pacific chain of command." Those instructors, by the way, once described Lohrenz as engaging in a "high and fast" landing technique, which "scared everyone but her."

*

To learn more about this case and for current reports on today's military, subscribe to CMR s newsletter. Contact: Center for Military Readiness, P.O. Box 51600, Livonia, MI 48151; (303) 464-9430; http://www.cmrlink.org

Copyright © 2001 Issues & Views


Printer-friendly version
Printer-friendly version

home | printable  

Copyright © 2010 Issues & Views
All rights reserved.
Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.
Last updated: Fri Aug 13 09:41:07 2010 AKDT

?>