Home
 This wasn't supposed to happen here
"Something is wrong"
Imprisoned for writing fiction
Tolerance for everything except religious belief
Get thee to a shrink
A war of attrition
The gun in the fanny pack
All the land a prison
Betrayal and deceit
Is it really "faith based?"
Hate crime hoaxes
The deadly war rages on
Mississippi goes global
The wrong man
Feds trump California voters
Free speech and anonymity
Free speech and double standards
Your life for a hoax
Complaints, suspensions and condemnations
Security vs. American freedoms
More security vs. freedom fallout
Democracy is sustained by public skepticism
Snitching for visas
A horror story
A moratorium on student visas
Biased newsrooms
De-Christianizing America
Digitized and tattooed citizens
A law for every distasteful thought
Turn off the immigration spigot
A creepy feeling; No longer the Great Unwatched
Raids and more raids
Children as hostages
Fraud and incompetence
The vanishing jury trial
Hamilton, peaceful no more
Using RICO to punish dissenters
A nefarious campus hotline
Empowered to steal
Will rights be restored?
Bringing down families
Raids, stun grenades and teddy bears, too
The medicated generation
Zealous police and zero tolerance
Victims of "racial balancing"
A tool in the divorce regime
Stamping out state law
Conniving bureaucrats and bullying politicians
The "valid" illegal
Knowledge is power
And now make way for "word crimes"
More concerns about freedom
Mind-altering greed
Another "diversity" shakedown
Slowing down the snoopers
State vs. federal: Whose law prevails?
Challenging nothing and no one
Of banned T-shirts and coerced letters
Abandon hope in Silicon Valley
Partisans for cheap labor
The cross-burning decision
A zero tolerance agenda?
A wholesale transfer of power
The feminists won
Reefer madness continues to degrade the law
All in the name of "diversity," the toy of elites
The Supreme Court joins the Diversity faith
Subordinating the Constitution to foreign law
When did we get this mean?
An Independence Day that comes later every year
Forfeiture business as usual
When they came for the Baptists . . .
Justice attained through luck, not rights
The coming nightmare of Balkanization
Asset forfeiture, or legal looting
President Fox's nation
Immigration troubles: No end in sight
His day in court
Banning criticism of government
A damaging lesson
When did we get this mean? - Part 2
Still pouring across the border
Brown still doing its damage
Checking those ties to slavery
Lawsuits to coerce "diversity"
Government induced dishonesty
Prohibition . . . again
The War on Drugs still taking its toll
Protecting private and public dissent
Judicial vandalism
When Lincoln made free speech illegal
Just an ordinary mouse
Expositor, not creator, of fundamental law
No escape
"Poison pill" laws
And now, a license to publish
Rights go "too far"
Is it a Trojan Horse?
Eminent domain: Taking from Peter to give to Paul
Stifling unpopular speech
Backlash in New Jersey
The overzealous integrationist court
Trying to fill those recruitment quotas
"We've been through this before"
The billion dollar fraud
Just More of the Same
 
Printer-friendly versionView Printable Format
Contact Issues & Views
(Also enter "Subscribe" to receive free Biweekly Updates)

The gun in the fanny pack

This wasn't supposed to happen here

[Reprinted from Issues & Views August 13, 2001]

It wasn't supposed to happen that in America citizens could be denied the right to carry a gun for possible defense. Yet one day when John Horstman of Elgin, Illinois, decided to take his unloaded gun with him, concealed in a fanny pack (a pouch worn around the waist), he found himself in big trouble. Here's how John Birch, president of Concealed Carry, Inc., a gun advocacy group, tells it:

"John Horstman did not set out to be a hero on Tuesday July 25th when he went bike riding in unincorporated DuPage County. Details are sketchy and indefinite at this point, but evidently someone called the DuPage Sheriff to report a man exposing himself on the trail. Along comes Mr. Horstman on his bike and the DuPage Sheriff stops him because 'He could be the person they are looking for.'

"Ordering him off his bike, the deputies quickly discovered loaded magazines on his belt and then the search got down in the dirt UGLY. Mr. Horstman's unloaded Taurus was found in a "day planner" style carry case. He was transported to DuPage County Jail and charged with Aggravated Unlawful Use of Weapon. After a night in jail and breakfast of cold French toast, Mr. Horstman was transported to his bond hearing.

"At the bond hearing they demonized Mr. Horstman over this false allegation [of being the flasher] to get his bond set at $250,000. (He is not charged with anything except Unlawful Use of Weapons.) You read right. . . for fanny pack carry the bond is ONE QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS! Mr. Horstman had to post $25,000 in cash and turn his [other] guns over to the DuPage Sheriff to make bail. Is this America?"

The Chicago Tribune, in an article that pre-dates the Horstman case, explains some details about Illinois gun law:

"A growing number of registered Illinois gun owners believe they've found a legal loophole that allows them to carry concealed handguns and ammunition in public, tucked in specially designed fanny packs. Legal experts, police and prosecutors are debating the novel gun-law interpretation, which has gained adherents--and critics--across the state in a matter of months.

"The fanny pack advocates have latched on to a long-standing clause in state law that permits a registered owner to carry a gun that is unloaded and 'enclosed in a case ... or other container.' The idea that specially designed fanny packs meet that standard has not been tested in court, and the question is apparently unique to Illinois, one of only seven states that bar most people from carrying concealed firearms.

"On the home turf of the Champaign County Rifle Association, Urbana police say the statute is ambiguous enough that they've decided against making arrests for now. If officers encounter somebody with a gun in a fanny pack, they will note the incident and leave any decision on charges up to prosecutors. 'Our policy is that we'll write a report and we'll see whether the state's attorney brings charges or not, because [the law] is arguable both ways,' Lt. James Page said.

"Both the Illinois State Police and the attorney general's office declined to discuss the fanny pack issue. Few court decisions on record in Illinois involve cases for carrying guns and none settles the fanny pack issue directly, experts say. And until a pertinent case arises, many agencies will not offer an opinion on how a hypothetical case might be handled."

Well, here's how the real case was handled. Gun owners were mobilized by various advocacy groups, most prominent among them, Concealed Carry, Inc., based in Oak Brook, Illinois. A large contingent of gun-owning protesters, wearing fanny packs, of course, were expected to rally at John Horstman's arraignment that was scheduled for August 20. However, on August 7, Horstman was informed by the DuPage County State's Attorney that all charges against him were being dropped.

John Birch, president of Concealed Carry, declared to his group's membership: "On the one hand it would have been great to have had our test case, but I can see the State of Illinois simply did not want to do that. Further, Mr. Horstman has suffered enough, and it is because of your hard work in energizing gun owners to support Mr. Horstman on Aug. 20th that the State's Attorney took a personal interest in this case. In short, without firing a shot, we have made our point."

Thomas Knapp, of Free-Market.net, who had also rallied the troops, told his members: "John Horstman is a free man now. The charges have been dropped. The prosecutor has held a press conference, in which he indicated that he would not arrest anyone else on these bogus charges, but that he wants the legislature to close the 'loophole' that actually allows people to exercise their rights. We won! Concealed Carry, Inc., gun activists from around the U.S., and free-marketeers like yourself, faced down a bad prosecutor and made him blink. And we'll be prepared to do even more, even faster, next time."

The day before the announcement of the dropped charges, the Chicago Tribune had this to say:

"DuPage County State's Atty. Joseph E. Birkett says he knows what the law means. His office has charged Horstman--a 40-year-old computer systems engineer whose only brush with the law had been a speeding ticket--with aggravated unlawful use of a weapon. If convicted, Horstman could serve up to 3 years in prison. 'I don't believe that the exemptions are there to allow people to arm themselves,' said Birkett. 'I read the law, and I've studied it,' said Horstman, who was released July 25 after posting a $25,000 cash bond. 'I'm in compliance with the law. I'm not a danger to anyone. I am licensed by the state police.'"

After hearing the good news that the charges against him had been dropped, Horstman said, in a thank you to his supporters:

"I really needed to hear your words and to know that so many others are on my side on this. I received e-mails of support and prayer from gun owners and non-gun owners alike, from law enforcement officers, military people, even prosecutors from other  jurisdictions! Believe me, I was as shocked and offended as you were when I was unfairly charged with a crime. But when the State’s Attorney found out how shocked and offended we the people were he quickly and rightly corrected this travesty of justice."

Score another victory for the good guys -- and the Constitution.


Here are links to the organizations mentioned above:

Concealed Carry, Inc.

Free-Market.net

Copyright © 2010 Issues & Views


Printer-friendly version
Printer-friendly version

home | printable  

Copyright © 2010 Issues & Views
All rights reserved.
Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.
Last updated: Thu May 20 14:08:11 2010 AKDT

?>