Home
 This wasn't supposed to happen here
"Something is wrong"
Imprisoned for writing fiction
Tolerance for everything except religious belief
Get thee to a shrink
A war of attrition
The gun in the fanny pack
All the land a prison
Betrayal and deceit
Is it really "faith based?"
Hate crime hoaxes
The deadly war rages on
Mississippi goes global
The wrong man
Feds trump California voters
Free speech and anonymity
Free speech and double standards
Your life for a hoax
Complaints, suspensions and condemnations
Security vs. American freedoms
More security vs. freedom fallout
Democracy is sustained by public skepticism
Snitching for visas
A horror story
A moratorium on student visas
Biased newsrooms
De-Christianizing America
Digitized and tattooed citizens
A law for every distasteful thought
Turn off the immigration spigot
A creepy feeling; No longer the Great Unwatched
Raids and more raids
Children as hostages
Fraud and incompetence
The vanishing jury trial
Hamilton, peaceful no more
Using RICO to punish dissenters
A nefarious campus hotline
Empowered to steal
Will rights be restored?
Bringing down families
Raids, stun grenades and teddy bears, too
The medicated generation
Zealous police and zero tolerance
Victims of "racial balancing"
A tool in the divorce regime
Stamping out state law
Conniving bureaucrats and bullying politicians
The "valid" illegal
Knowledge is power
And now make way for "word crimes"
More concerns about freedom
Mind-altering greed
Another "diversity" shakedown
Slowing down the snoopers
State vs. federal: Whose law prevails?
Challenging nothing and no one
Of banned T-shirts and coerced letters
Abandon hope in Silicon Valley
Partisans for cheap labor
The cross-burning decision
A zero tolerance agenda?
A wholesale transfer of power
The feminists won
Reefer madness continues to degrade the law
All in the name of "diversity," the toy of elites
The Supreme Court joins the Diversity faith
Subordinating the Constitution to foreign law
When did we get this mean?
An Independence Day that comes later every year
Forfeiture business as usual
When they came for the Baptists . . .
Justice attained through luck, not rights
The coming nightmare of Balkanization
Asset forfeiture, or legal looting
President Fox's nation
Immigration troubles: No end in sight
His day in court
Banning criticism of government
A damaging lesson
When did we get this mean? - Part 2
Still pouring across the border
Brown still doing its damage
Checking those ties to slavery
Lawsuits to coerce "diversity"
Government induced dishonesty
Prohibition . . . again
The War on Drugs still taking its toll
Protecting private and public dissent
Judicial vandalism
When Lincoln made free speech illegal
Just an ordinary mouse
Expositor, not creator, of fundamental law
No escape
"Poison pill" laws
And now, a license to publish
Rights go "too far"
Is it a Trojan Horse?
Eminent domain: Taking from Peter to give to Paul
Stifling unpopular speech
Backlash in New Jersey
The overzealous integrationist court
Trying to fill those recruitment quotas
"We've been through this before"
The billion dollar fraud
Just More of the Same
 
Printer-friendly versionView Printable Format
Contact Issues & Views
(Also enter "Subscribe" to receive free Biweekly Updates)

A law for every distasteful thought

This wasn't supposed to happen here

[Reprinted from Issues & Views January 28, 2002]

Will they never cease doing end runs around the Constitution? In two separate cases, the states of Texas and Maryland have already committed the outrageous act of granting 10-year prison sentences to young white men who foolishly burned crosses on the properties of blacks. Certainly, these men are not serving time in jail for having burned some pieces of wood, so the states must be punishing them for the supposed thoughts in their heads, as each committed his "crime."

Now, here come politicians in the state of Virginia eager to impose similar laws that are blatantly unconstitutional. From the Virginian-Pilot (1/16/02), we learn:

Five local lawmakers have proposed a new, wider law aimed at criminalizing cross burning, just months after the Virginia Supreme Court struck down a 50-year-old state law that made the activity illegal. The proposal avoids the term ``cross burning,'' which the Virginia Supreme Court in November ruled is a protected form of speech under the First Amendment. The proposal, in the form of five identical bills, broadens the state law to make it a felony to burn any object on property with the intent to intimidate. . . .

Free speech advocates argue that cross burning, however offensive, should be constitutionally protected. A 1952 state law prohibiting cross burning made the offense punishable by up to five years in prison. A similar law in Minnesota was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court 10 years ago. . . .

Kevin Martingayle, a Virginia Beach lawyer who represented one of the defendants in a cross-burning case, said the new bill addresses part of the constitutional problems, but ``it's not going to be a panacea. It's very difficult to create a constitutionally sound hate crime legislation, especially when it comes to expressions. It can't be used as a muzzle for every distasteful thought.''

The bills--HB1005, HB1059, HB1173, SB111 and SB410--are expected to start moving through the legislature this week.

Copyright © 2010 Issues & Views


Printer-friendly version
Printer-friendly version

home | printable  

Copyright © 2010 Issues & Views
All rights reserved.
Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.
Last updated: Sat Feb 27 10:09:49 2010 AKST

?>