Home
 An unpopular truth
Misdirected rage
NAACP stoops still lower
Selective justice
Legislating their own extinction
Rappers summit
A statist illusion
Who should pay?
The drug war's ongoing nightmare
Adapting to our mistakes
Enforced diversity
Poisoned race relations
Canadian hypocrisy
Not a watchdog, but a partner
Give up more freedoms?
Built-in safeguards?
Reading the fine print
Preemptive liberalism
Vanished immigrants
Black slaveholders
Reaching a new low
Inconvenient news
Passing the litmus test
La dolce vita vs. Islam
Anti-smoking tyrants
Power, the ultimate goal
The holy grail of snoopery
A vacuum of moral authority
Crying victim
Truly telling it like it is
Conjectures and myths
Africa's ongoing descent
A school with a colored memory
Where fear rules
Yes to voodoo
His subject is nothing
Government accounting tricks
Studying the obvious
Cashing in on "slavery"
Psychology, sexology, and the deadened sense of sin
Illegal aliens, with us forever
A land of busy TIPsters
Inventing enemies to force an agenda
England facing extinction
Ongoing amnesty for illegals
Safe at any price
Is there an "American people?"
Zimbabwe comes full circle
Old story, new strategy
The cult of non-achievement
Just don't tell the truth
Good sense prevails in Pasadena
Hate crime as "prank" when committed by blacks
A shameless nation
Take off the training wheels
Catching the potential lawbreaker
Critic as enemy?
The United States of Mexico
The demented scribblings of hip-hop
Watching is getting easier
Trading politics for economics
Repression escalates in Zimbabwe
Lay-offs and cheap labor
Freedom to choose
A break in the silence
The emasculation is done
Ceding power to the court
To police the world or not?
Still busy balancing those races
A club for me, but not for you
Trying to keep the folks at home
Even wrong ideas should be heard
The all-purpose smear
Pledge of Allegiance folly
Black victimhood
Government's unbridled power
Fantasy or history?
Beating the bushes for racism
A belated resolution
Africanizing Italy
The Reparations racket is still with us
Jobless and untouchable
A culture of lawlessness
Jeopardized by self-destruction
Sneaking in another "hate crimes" law
Our pregnant military
Two views on Christians and politics
The Twilight Zone of Left and Right
Closing the floodgates
Coming soon: the global job fair
Mocking the system with illegal votes
A different kind of set aside
Another intrusive program
Still fighting the futile battle
What about the others?
The Dutch wake up to a nightmare
Bureaucrats and children's mental health
P.C. still rules the campus
Desperately trying to stay relevant
Too emotional to handle debate
The rap contagion
Children as fodder for the government-pharmaceutical cabal
The ruin of the "breadbasket"
The latest call for "civil rights"
Feeding on itself
NULL
 
Printer-friendly versionView Printable Format
Contact Issues & Views
(Also enter "Subscribe" to receive free Biweekly Updates)

Reading the fine print

An unpopular truth

[Reprinted from Issues & Views October 22, 2001]

Paul Weyrich of Washington, DC's Free Congress Foundation expresses his concerns about the new Anti-Terrorism Act passed by Congress. The following is excerpted from "Will American Freedom Pay the Price Because Congress Did Not Read the Fine Print?":

I have the distinct belief that one day in the not too distant future we will look back at this piece of hastily drawn and ill-considered 250-plus page piece of legislation (which almost no one has read) and we will exclaim: "Good Lord, what have we done? What has happened to the American way of life?"

Right now the government is looked to as the solution, not as the problem. Before Oklahoma City, most Americans thought of government as the problem. After the bombing of the federal center there, it became a 50/50 proposition. About half of Americans thought of government as the problem, about half saw it as the solution. Now with the Trade Center/Pentagon bombings the vast majority of the public is again looking to the government as the solution. . . .

Many of them [in the Bush Administration] have a long record of advocating and implementing ideas that would safeguard, preserve, and advance freedom. So, although I would be surprised if it were the case, let us make sure that the Bush team will not violate the Constitution in implementing the new powers given it by the Congress. . . . .

The next Administration could well be draconian in its approach to our civil liberties. They might well take every power given to it in this bill and use it to the nth degree. Then we will surely cry out, "What has happened to our American way of life?" I have a hunch, however, we will be hearing that outcry far sooner than eight years from now. It will not be because I don't trust Bush and Ashcroft and most of the people around them. I do. What I don't trust is human nature. And human nature being what it is, lots of people in government are going to be tempted to play fast and loose with our liberties because Congress was anxious to get out of town and refused to take the time to really understand the legislation they have written.

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views


Printer-friendly version
Printer-friendly version

home | printable  

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views
All rights reserved.
Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.
Last updated: Sun May 11 14:22:03 2008 CDT