Home
 On its way to the USA
Speech codes in Canada
Will there always be an England?
Time to duck in England
More news of repression from Canada
The power to snoop
The dwindling freedoms that remain
Trumping parents' rights
On Tribunals and "hate crimes"
A cloud of political correctness
Sanitizing the Internet
The coming loss of liberties
Criminalizing thought
Watch what you say
Prosecuted for "insulting the state"
Open door Canada
The world turned upside down
Police powers in Europe
Tracking the citizenry
A map of your life
Europe's monitors of hate
Animal Farm thrives north of the border
Criminalizing everything in England
Whose law shall prevail?
Xenophobic about EU repression
Coercing a "common" culture
Jailed for "personality disorders"
Remaking mankind . . . again
Beacon to the world no longer?
Norway takes the lead
Intolerant laws
Europe censors itself
Punishing personal beliefs
Losing sovereignty and rights
The roving investigator
The immigrant flood continues
"Binationals" and dual allegiance
Goodbye to national sovereignty?
The new totalitarianism
England's web of surveillance
Stifling dissent in Singapore
Diminishing freedom for greater "rights"
The Brits gone balmy
Free speech fails again in Canada
 
Printer-friendly versionView Printable Format
Contact Issues & Views
(Also enter "Subscribe" to receive free Biweekly Updates)

A map of your life

On its way to the USA

[Reprinted from Issues & Views November 12, 2001]

In describing new powers now granted to England's police, Stuart Millar writes in the Guardian:

Sweeping proposals to give law enforcement agencies access to the communications records of every UK telephone and internet user will not be restricted to anti-terrorist investigations, despite assurances to the contrary from the home secretary. The Guardian has established that the detailed communications data to be retained as part of the government's response to the September 11 attacks will be available to police investigating minor crimes. It will also be available for tax collection and public health and safety purposes.

Home Office officials involved in implementing the proposals in a voluntary code of practice with the providers have confirmed there are no plans to limit access to cases involving national security. This directly contradicts what appeared to be an assurance given by David Blunkett, the home secretary, two weeks ago in an attempt to soothe the fears of civil liberties campaigners about the privacy implications of blanket data retention.

According to the Foundation for Information Policy Research, an independent internet think tank, data involved would provide a "complete map of an individual's life".

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views


Printer-friendly version
Printer-friendly version

home | printable  

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views
All rights reserved.
Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.
Last updated: Sun May 11 14:22:03 2008 CDT