Home
 On its way to the USA
Speech codes in Canada
Will there always be an England?
Time to duck in England
More news of repression from Canada
The power to snoop
The dwindling freedoms that remain
Trumping parents' rights
On Tribunals and "hate crimes"
A cloud of political correctness
Sanitizing the Internet
The coming loss of liberties
Criminalizing thought
Watch what you say
Prosecuted for "insulting the state"
Open door Canada
The world turned upside down
Police powers in Europe
Tracking the citizenry
A map of your life
Europe's monitors of hate
Animal Farm thrives north of the border
Criminalizing everything in England
Whose law shall prevail?
Xenophobic about EU repression
Coercing a "common" culture
Jailed for "personality disorders"
Remaking mankind . . . again
Beacon to the world no longer?
Norway takes the lead
Intolerant laws
Europe censors itself
Punishing personal beliefs
Losing sovereignty and rights
The roving investigator
The immigrant flood continues
"Binationals" and dual allegiance
Goodbye to national sovereignty?
The new totalitarianism
England's web of surveillance
Stifling dissent in Singapore
Diminishing freedom for greater "rights"
The Brits gone balmy
Free speech fails again in Canada
 
Printer-friendly versionView Printable Format
Contact Issues & Views
(Also enter "Subscribe" to receive free Biweekly Updates)

"Binationals" and dual allegiance

On its way to the USA

[Reprinted from Issues & Views May 20, 2002]

As United Nations "summit" meetings and authoritarian directives from The Hague's "Tribunals" push to make us all citizens of the world, syndicated columnist Phyllis Schlafly offers some sober reflections on the loss of national identity. Here's an excerpt from "Dual Citizenship Is An Oxymoron," in which she describes the Mexican government's influence on what used to be U.S. law:

Everyone who is naturalized as a U.S. citizen must swear this solemn oath: "I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law ... "

Thus, in order to become a U.S. citizen, immigrants are required by law to transfer their allegiance from their native country to the United States of America. But our country is now confronted with the problem of immigrants who have been falsely led to believe that they are or can be dual citizens, and this dangerous notion is diluting our national identity and culture.

Mexico passed a law in 1998 that extends citizenship to Mexicans who are naturalized in other countries and to their children. This is an invitation to new U.S. citizens either to betray their oath of allegiance to the United States or to cross their fingers behind their backs when they take it.

Many statements by President Vicente Fox and other Mexican officials show that their plan is to export a segment of their population to the United States, let them become U.S. citizens, but retain them as Mexican citizens. Mexico wants these new American citizens to consider themselves "binationals," and to vote in both the United States and Mexico, with Mexican politicians campaigning for their votes and allegiance.

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views


Printer-friendly version
Printer-friendly version

home | printable  

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views
All rights reserved.
Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.
Last updated: Sun May 11 14:22:03 2008 CDT