Home
 On its way to the USA
Speech codes in Canada
Will there always be an England?
Time to duck in England
More news of repression from Canada
The power to snoop
The dwindling freedoms that remain
Trumping parents' rights
On Tribunals and "hate crimes"
A cloud of political correctness
Sanitizing the Internet
The coming loss of liberties
Criminalizing thought
Watch what you say
Prosecuted for "insulting the state"
Open door Canada
The world turned upside down
Police powers in Europe
Tracking the citizenry
A map of your life
Europe's monitors of hate
Animal Farm thrives north of the border
Criminalizing everything in England
Whose law shall prevail?
Xenophobic about EU repression
Coercing a "common" culture
Jailed for "personality disorders"
Remaking mankind . . . again
Beacon to the world no longer?
Norway takes the lead
Intolerant laws
Europe censors itself
Punishing personal beliefs
Losing sovereignty and rights
The roving investigator
The immigrant flood continues
"Binationals" and dual allegiance
Goodbye to national sovereignty?
The new totalitarianism
England's web of surveillance
Stifling dissent in Singapore
Diminishing freedom for greater "rights"
The Brits gone balmy
Free speech fails again in Canada
 
Printer-friendly versionView Printable Format
Contact Issues & Views
(Also enter "Subscribe" to receive free Biweekly Updates)

Goodbye to national sovereignty?

On its way to the USA

[Reprinted from Issues & Views June 3, 2002]

In Europe, the chickens are coming home to roost in the backyards of those countries whose ministers and parliamentary representatives vigorously worked to bring about a union of European countries. The Brits are gearing up to do battle with other EU members, who insist on enlarged powers for the central government in Brussels. The European Commission president, Romano Prodi, is pushing for what he calls "fundamental reform," which includes a direct EU tax on the citizens of all member states, i.e., a Euro-tax.

Prodi also wants to extend majority voting to tax and social policies, and is urging a harmonization of criminal laws. In London, the World quotes a Commission official saying, "We know these ideas will be sensitive, particularly for the British because they touch so closely on questions of national sovereignty." And a British official declares, "These are ideas whose time has not yet come."


Nick Schulz of Tech Central Station reports on the ambitious aims of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Proposals to be offered at the agency's forthcoming Johannesburg Summit include "reducing the excessive consumption of the more affluent." After citing similar wish-fantasies by UNEP bureaucrats, Schulz describes UN mandates designed to force member states to comply with multilateral environmental agreements.

"It boils down to one thing," writes Schulz, "ceding American sovereignty to the UN and other regulatory bodies." Although he believes there is little chance of such an eventuality, he concludes, "There is, indeed, a network of aggressive, well-funded and passionate elites seeking to impose a global regulatory regime. It's not fantasy to say so--all you need to do is read the UN's literature. They may or may not succeed. But no one can say we didn't see it coming."

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views


Printer-friendly version
Printer-friendly version

home | printable  

Copyright © 2008 Issues & Views
All rights reserved.
Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.
Last updated: Sun May 11 14:22:03 2008 CDT