Home
 Fighting the Good Fight
Hope
Seizing property and assets
A movement that just keeps growing
Confronting government regulations
Exposing search and seizure abuse
Defending the public interest
Defending home schooling families
Civilianizing the military
The much maligned Father Divine
Battling the degrading war
Operation Self-Defense
Allied to prevent loss of liberties
Rutherford's work is never done
Ending the drugging of children
Black pride and business
An indispensable business
Beware the tyranny of conformity
Uniontown entrepreneur
A victory in the battle against race preferences
Quotas take another hit
Turning the tide of illegal workers
Abuse of eminent domain
Preventing the seizure of assets
Making the most of opportunities
Opposing feminist malice
Do medicated children make for happy teachers?
Whose property is it anyway?
An Internet victory
No place for 7 watts of religion
Small victories
Homeschooling
Seizing property for private gain
The end of forced "diversity"?
More private property battles
Ending racial bean-counting
Foreign law or the Bill of Rights?
School choice: Milwaukee's successful battle
An old-fashioned Sagebrush Rebellion
The abuse goes on
How they did it; a grassroots success story
Renegade firefighters save their town
Grit and survival
Land in real estate limbo
Losing the battle for privacy
Playing with FIRE
The Sawgrass Rebellion struggles on
A place to live
Two victories
The corrupting influence of asset forfeiture
A noble gesture
A good ruling against a bad law
A victory and more work ahead
Reducing a source of votes and cheap labor
Smoke is not enough
Incremental amnesty
Using "blight" to seize property
More campus suppression of speech
Enemies of school choice
Getting a second chance
When charges are treated like verdicts
Doing it the old-fashioned way
Patriot resistance
Another step forward
Free speech to fit a gazebo
Winning free speech rights on campus
How long will this go on?
Good intentions, bad consequences
Speech codes and apologies
Beyond the bounds
Eminent domain: the nationwide epidemic
Another day, another victory
Japan for the Japanese
When judges don't judge
Trying to be tougher than the next guy
Another victim of eminent domain
Mixed opinions on southern heritage
Chipping away at set asides and quotas
Prosecution for profit
His name was lost, but not his deeds
The memorial vs. Goliath
Subverting "diversity"
A biased administration forced to uphold free speech
Incremental loss of freedom
Getting real with "replacement" populations
Flattering words lead to a lawsuit
Devising new tricks to confiscate property
Free speech allies
Shedding light on history
Pay up, shut up, and be ignored
Getting closer to real "diversity"
Winning some battles in Leviathan's war
Five more years for your thoughts
Cruel and irrational
Encouraging illegal immigration
Turning women into warriors
Liberated from Jackson
Utah's "hate crimes" lobby tries again
A lost battle in the war against "hate crime" laws
A small, but effective army
The enemies have already prevailed
The battle for immigration reform heats up
A populist movement subverting the elites
Taking the heat, but not backing down
Environment is not destiny
 
Printer-friendly versionView Printable Format
Contact Issues & Views
(Also enter "Subscribe" to receive free Biweekly Updates)

Another step forward

Fighting the good fight

[Reprinted from Issues & Views June 2, 2003]

The National Association for Neighborhood Schools (NANS) reminds us of the continuing abuses stemming from the manipulation of the races in school districts and at colleges and universities. Sometimes this manipulation is government-driven, but often it is imposed by school administrators. In the current Spring 2003 edition of the NANS newsletter, in "Backing Away From Race," we learn some good news about changes occurring in a few places:


At least ten public and private universities including Princeton University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) took action to end or alter summer programs that accept only minorities following a campaign by the Center for Equal Opportunity (CEO) and the American Civil Rights Institute (ACRI).

The groups wrote letters to the universities, threatening to file complaints against them with the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights, if the programs were not changed. The Center for Equal Opportunity and the American Civil Rights Institute contacted Princeton in January regarding its Junior Summer Institute. Eligibility was limited to "students of color" in violation of Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which bans such discrimination on the grounds of race, color or national origin by recipients of federal funds.

If Princeton did not end the discrimination, the threat was that a formal complaint would be filed with the Office for Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Education which administers Title VI with respect to federally funded schools. The Ford Foundation, which had initially funded the program, had concluded five years ago that the program was discriminatory and had stopped its funding.

MIT's summer program excluded whites and Asians. A complaint was actually filed with the Office for Civil Rights. The result was that MIT decided to end the racial exclusivity of its program.


For more information on the struggle to reform race policies in public schools and colleges, visit the website of the National Association for Neighborhood Schools. Inquire about membership in NANS to receive the organization's informative hard copy newsletter (e-mail: RHaws@aol.com).

Copyright © 2010 Issues & Views


Printer-friendly version
Printer-friendly version

home | printable  

Copyright © 2010 Issues & Views
All rights reserved.
Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.
Last updated: Thu May 20 14:08:11 2010 AKDT

?>